Search for: "UBER, INC"
Results 241 - 260
of 790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 2:02 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:58 am
Jan-Pro Franchising International Inc., according to Katherine Catlos, a partner in Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP’s San Francisco office. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc.). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:25 am
Uber Technologies Inc., 2019 ONCA 1 [3] The appellant commenced this proposed class action on behalf of “[a]ny person, since 2012, who worked or continues to work for Uber in Ontario as a Partner and/or independent contractor, providing any of the services outlined in Paragraph 4 of the Statement of Claim pursuant to a Partner and/or independent contractor agreement” (the “Class” or “Class Members”). [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:35 pm
Groupon, Inc., 3:15-CV-00520-GCM (W.D.N.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 8:41 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., 2016 WL 5854224 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:53 pm
Inc. earlier this year, where the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2016, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Uber Canada inc. c. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:53 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:14 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 7:40 pm
Startups & Inventors for Jobs (USU); Bill Harmon, Director, IP and Trademarks, Uber Technologies, Inc.; Philip Hirschhorn of Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP; and Liane Peterson of Foley & Lardner LLP. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 8:36 pm
.; Stephan Wolke of Thyssenkrupp Intellectual Property GmbH; and Bill Harmon of Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:14 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 1:55 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., Docket 15-16178, 15-16250, for publication, opinion by Judge Richard Clifton).Procédure, contenu des mémoires, manquer à citer un allégué au plus tard dans la réponse : le 9è Circuit fédéral observe en l’espèce que les demandeurs ont allégué un fait pour la première fois dans une réponse additionnelle. [read post]
