Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FRANCE" Results 241 - 260 of 1,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2010, 9:45 am
The first inference is that the “country” governing licenses executed by North Americans must be the United States because Maryland is part of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am by Anna Christensen
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by assoulineberlowe
Supreme Court reversed a decision of the 11th Circuit (Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Would the United States have been able to transfer them from Mexico to France? [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
 Legal Reasoning (Per Curiam)AnalysisCause of DelayPatentee SCR Pharmatop filed its initial patent appli- cation in France on June 6, 2000 and, in conformity with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), filed an interna- tional patent application identifying the United States, among others, as a designated state on June 6, 2001. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:54 am by Suzanne Ito
Tomorrow, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), Europe's top human rights court based in Strasbourg, France, will hear arguments in El-Masri v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:23 am
Early, Exploring the Final Frontier: An Empirical Analysis of Global Civil Space Proliferation Lori Poloni-Staudinger & Candice Ortbals, The Domestic Determinants of Transnational Activity: An Examination of Women's Groups in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany Trade and GlobalizationMark S. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:16 am
He was 49 and President of the United States. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
Various parties ("the Opponents") who were also involved in rubber flooring products opposed this request on the basis that it had already registered the word DALSOUPLE as a UK and Community trade marks for the same classes and goods.In these proceedings Dalsouple France sought a declaration of invalidity in relation to the Opponents' UK trade mark, relying on section 3(6) of the 1994 which governs bad faith: said Dalsouple France, the Opponent must have applied to… [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:19 am by Matthew Waxman
The United States was counting on Britain, which too wanted to keep continental European powers out of Latin America, to also intervene if necessary. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:44 am by Victoria VanBuren
  Soon after, the USADA announced that three members of Armstrong’s team have all received lifetime periods of ineligibility as the result of their anti-doping rule violations in the United States Postal Service (USPS) Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 9:09 am by Cindy Cohn
The decision is a model that we hope other courts, including those in the United States, will follow. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 5:36 am
Adams is shown firing two cabinet members, Secretary of State Timothy Pickering and Secretary of War James McHenry, because both were too in thrall to Hamilton (whom Adams clearly disliked) and to the Federalist Party and too committed (rather openly) to furthering Federalist goals at the expense of the goals of the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:10 pm by Christiana Wayne
  French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian accused the United States of stabbing France in the back in its nuclear submarine deal with Australia, according to Al Jazeera. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Compare Appellant's Brief at 2-29 with United States v. [read post]