Search for: "US v. Bowens"
Results 241 - 260
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2009, 1:44 pm
Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Allen, Jacob Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am
Roy and Lyng v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:00 pm
Authored by Christopher Bowen (202) 772-5348 cbowen@sheppardmullin.com [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On 22 March 2023, the defendant’s application for summary judgement was dismissed in the case of Frati v Bowen-Carter [2023] EWHC 627 (KB). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Bowen v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
” Bowen v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
She argued that the use of animal products or animal testing in the production of the vaccines meant that some (but not all) Muslims considered their use to be haram (forbidden) and that it would be contrary to her Muslim faith for WSP to be vaccinated. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:08 pm
” Bowen v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
My hypothesis draws upon Ahmet Kuru's very useful typology of secularisms: Passive secularism, which requires that the secular state play a "passive" role in avoiding the establishment of any religions, allows for the public visibility of religion. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:35 am
” Bowen v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 6:53 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Humanists’ membership of SACREs Humanist UK reports that Kent County Council has decided not to appeal the judgment in R (Bowen) v Kent County Council [2023] EWHC 1261 (Admin). [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
This is done by explaining which life expectancy figure was used and that the Employee’s compensation rate has been prorated pursuant to the holding in Sciarotta v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm
On 21 November 2022, judgment was handed down in Marks v Allen, 2022 BCSC 2024. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
However, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed an analogous situation in Bowen v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
(See, e.g., Bowen v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
