Search for: "US v. David Jones"
Results 241 - 260
of 744
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2018, 7:30 am
Scott Harman summarized the proceedings in Doe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s order [the case is Olivia de… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
In his dissent from denial of cert earlier this year in Silvester v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
The Socially aware blog uses the recent case of Herrick v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
Briefly: For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports on a pending cert petition, Kisela v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Jones, the court has no jurisdiction” is no more valid than one that says “In Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm
Jones (Johns Hopkins) on "Legal History's Debt to Frederick Douglass. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
In contrast, Master McCloud in Paxton Jones v Chichester Harbour Conservancy [2017] EWHC 2270 found that the deeming provisions operate as a means of calculating other deadlines, such as the acknowledgement of service and defence. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
ArtsTechnica told us in Ma [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:02 pm
[v]. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm
The most trenchant of them was offered by Judge David Sentelle in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Included in the tributes to the book and its subject is this from David Phillip Jones QC, “Administrative lawyer in private practice, Conflict of Interest Commissioner for Yukon and for NWT. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:27 pm
Kelley, David M. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court was asked an increasingly familiar question: Does the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
DAVID MORTIMER (A-11-93) (NOTE: This is a companion case to State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
A jury said yes, and the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Hicks v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
Guidry v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
Guidry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Brunson & David J. [read post]
