Search for: "US v. Farrell"
Results 241 - 260
of 336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
Thanks are due to the various readers who mailed the IPKat about this decision, with special mention to barrister Gemma O'Farrell. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
Thanks are due to the various readers who mailed the IPKat about this decision, with special mention to barrister Gemma O'Farrell. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:45 am
The "Jif" lemon from Reckitt and Coleman v Borden Brennan’s had argued that the similarities were generic – the shape and type of packaging, the use of descriptors such as “wholewheat”, and the use of the colour green – and that McCambridge’s could not enjoy any goodwill in them. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
[the LLC's] members'" (quoting Kelly v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
Court Rejects Oppressed Shareholder’s Bid for Dissolution or Buy-Out, Finds Money Damages Sufficient
5 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
(Full disclosure: one of the respondents in Hammad is a Farrell Fritz client.) [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Watkins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
© 2012 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 12:50 pm
Land Use & Envtl. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
© 2012 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Feinberg v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
"© 2012 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 2:27 am
Consider the case of Bare v AL. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
" Bernard Frieder argues that US patent reform will have a "profound effect" in Israel, opening patents to perpetual challenges. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Chris's discussion begins with a summary of New York law concerning marketability discount that I prepared for a post several months ago featuring the Cole v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 3:32 am
The defendants countered with post-Tzolis case law, including Billings v Bridgepoint Partners, LLC, 21 Misc 3d 535 [Sup Ct, Erie County 2008], denying derivative standing to a withdrawn member. [read post]
