Search for: "US v. Lucas"
Results 241 - 260
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
Lucas, 795 N.E.2d at 647. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:10 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
* Unauthorized Use of Photograph to Create Fake Dating Profile Not a Violation of Lanham ActMarie-Andrée reports on Yuliana Avalos v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
by Dennis Crouch In Teva v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 10:04 pm
Why didn't Marvel, DC, or Lucas put a stop to it? [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:02 pm
Categorical regulatory takings that deprive property owners of all economically beneficial use of property, pronounced in Lucas v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:08 pm
’” Needham, 459 A.2d at 1063 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:27 am
Lucas v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:27 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
Thanks so much, Luca, for sharing your experiences with us. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Justice Kagan accurately highlighted the prevalence of state law issues in several cases, including Lucas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Justice Kagan accurately highlighted the prevalence of state law issues in several cases, including Lucas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
The Solicitor General had urged the Court to deny review in Lucas v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:53 am
Plaintiffs alleged a temporary taking based on three theories: the refusal and delay in granting the permit took away any economically viable use of the property (Lucas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
Concurrent wives and concurrent use of trade marks in Lucas' first guest-post -- who could ask for more? [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:34 pm
After all, it was a shoreline development ban -- also based on erosion -- that resulted in the Lucas decision (Lucas v. [read post]