Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica) [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
(IAM) US Trade Marks – Decisions 9th Circuit finds ‘Would you rather? [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am
At the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews one of tomorrow’s cases, Kelly v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:02 am
This case, known as Microsoft v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars) US Copyright – Decisions District Court S D New York: Pleading new post-registration copyright infringement: IDEA v PETA (The Trademark Blog) Judge Swain dismisses Missy Chase Lapine’s copyright infringement claim against Jessica Seinfeld in dispute over competing recipe books (IPKat) US Trademarks Domino’s video offers food for thought for businesses – corporate damage… [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am
In our recent paper, we critique Abbott’s proposal whilst contemplating AI’s status as property or person.It is perhaps most interesting to compare the contrasting fortunes of the Project’s filings in Australia (Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879) and England and Wales (Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat)/Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs… [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:45 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 10:55 am
Mark Foley (yes THAT Mark Foley) "announced a bill called the Child Modeling Exploitation Prevention Act that would effectively ban the sale of photographs of minors. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:04 pm
However, as usual, prolific “commentator for all seasons” Mark Stephens was ahead of the pack – featuring in the “Guardian”, “The Independent” and the Mail. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Allen, Jacob Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
WPNA 1490 AM (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CACF affirms TTAB ruling: X-PIPE is generic for engine exhausts Monty Allen Campbell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
WPNA 1490 AM (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CACF affirms TTAB ruling: X-PIPE is generic for engine exhausts Monty Allen Campbell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:40 pm
On February 20, 2013, Roberts marked Kennedy’s 25th anniversary on the court, with slightly different language than he used today. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, striking down Michigan’s ban on the use of affirmative action by its public universities. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
Also in The National Law Review, Mark Salzberg discusses last week’s oral argument in Czyzewski v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IPRoo), Review of National Innovation System – Key points for corporate counsel: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Review of National Innovation System recommends creative commons: (creativecommons.org), Review of Innovation System released: (IP Menu News), What [right]’s in a [business] name: Westpac Banking Corporation v McMillan & Melbas On The Park Pty Ltd (formerly Credit Systems Australia Pty Ltd): (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Senator… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
Lyle Denniston of this blog previews both cases, as does Mark Sherman of the Associated Press. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Google Scholar: most cited capital punishment cases - CWRU Law patrons may use Shepard's on Lexis and KeyCite on Westlaw to find additional research resources. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 11:20 pm
In Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat), the England and Wales High Court has dismissed an appeal by Dr Stephen Thaler from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO), which determined that one or more natural persons must be named as inventor(s) on a patent application and, therefore, that two UK applications naming an ‘artificial intelligence’ called DABUS as inventor were deemed to be… [read post]
