Search for: "US v. Peter Paul" Results 241 - 260 of 779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2018, 3:52 am
 Many of the marks applied for or registered by the applicant consist of common names, such as ANNA, JESSICA, JULIA, ALAN, HOWARD, CHRISTINE, ELIZABETH, RYAN, PAUL, PETER or other words, such as the names of colours, BLUE, SAND, EBONY, EMERALD. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Laurie Blank addressed whether using shovels as weapons in war is lawful. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Persuading the House: The Use of the Commons Journals as a Source of PrecedentMartyn Atkins5. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am by Vanessa Sauter
Paul Rosenzweig joined a number of officials in filing an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:50 am by Garrett Hinck
Peter Margulies detailed the context for the Supreme Court’s travel ban orders. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
’s new doctrine on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am by Garrett Hinck
Peter Margulies disagreed, arguing it undermined the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 11:51 am by Vanessa Sauter
Vanessa Sauter summarized the Senate vote to table Paul’s amendment to the 2018 NDAA. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am by Garrett Hinck
Peter Margulies shared his thoughts on the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 2:13 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
by Peter Mankowski Free choice of law appears to be the pivot and the unchallenged champion of the private international law of contracts. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Khuja (formerly PNM) v Times Newspapers [2017] UKSC 49 – see our comments from Paul Wragg and Robert Craig. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
This post follows Paul Wragg’s piece on this blog discussing the recent Supreme Court decision determining that the applicant had no right to anonymity after being named in open court by a witness in a high profile criminal case in Oxford. [read post]