Search for: "USA v. Ables" Results 241 - 260 of 1,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
Jennifer Leitch (Osgoode): “Taking Self-Represented Litigants Seriously: The Collective Responsibility of the Legal Profession” The access to justice conversation is among academics and regulators; it is not yet a live conversation among real lawyers Few people in this room (filled with relatively well-heeled professionals) would be able to afford a lawyer representing them in litigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Monasky v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 2:52 pm by Aaron Mackey
That’s why EFF filed a friend-of-the-court brief asking the court to reconsider its decision in Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
.: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on reauthorizing the USA Freedom Act of 2015. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and  the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:20 am by Michael Lowe
SCOTUS is also able to define and to expand the definition of fraud, as for example the currently pending Kelly v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
  Thus, the offending search results will continue to appear against complainant’s name in the USA, Canada, South Africa, Australia, Japan etc. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:24 pm by Jennifer Hillman
Roster of potential panelists Roster of up to 30 individuals willing and able to serve established by consensus by January 1, 1994; roster members appointed by consensus for term of 3 years and may be reappointed. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:32 am by Cory Doctorow
Standards-washing: the lesson of Bush v Gore But not all interoperability is created equal. [read post]