Search for: "USA v. Key" Results 241 - 260 of 1,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
(Richard Wolf, USA Today) Supreme Court Preview: Collins v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 10:19 am by NCC Staff
But what are the rights at issue and are they a key component of the lawsuit? [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 3:25 am by Apostolos Anthimos
Anastasia Kalantzi, PhD Candidate at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki who dealt with the key issue of European lis pendens rules and third countries; and, finally Mr. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
The 186th edition of the IPKat’s news roundup.DesignsKat friends Nina O’Sullivan and Victoria Wilson reported on the 2017 key design cases brought before both the EU and the UK’s courts in The best and the brightest: key UK and EU design decisions from 2017.Speaking of key decisions, following the DOCERAM v CeramTec CJEU judgement (C-395/16), Kat friend Alexander Haertel discusses the decision in detail and its possible repercussions in German… [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
Jewel v NSA, First Unitarian Church v NSA, and Smith v Obama in the Ninth Circuit A week after the Wikimedia ruling, the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:16 am by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: Nick Carter sued over Key West bar brawl arrest, Jan. 27, 2016, By Maria Puente, USA Today More Blog Entries: Coleman v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:42 am by Ellena Erskine
Board of Education families (Francesca Chambers, USA Today) The post The morning read for Thursday, May 16 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
John Wiley, it held that copyright law could not be used to prevent the parallel importation into the USA of works lawfully made outside of the USA. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
John Wiley, it held that copyright law could not be used to prevent the parallel importation into the USA of works lawfully made outside of the USA. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 11:05 am by Ronald Mann
Rimini Street v Oracle USA, set for argument on January 14, is another one of those routine statutory interpretation cases that reach the Supreme Court’s docket not because they present deep intellectual issues, but rather because of the justices’ continuing obligation to ensure uniformity in the decisions of the lower courts. [read post]