Search for: "USA v. Richard Justice" Results 241 - 260 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Richard Wolf at USA Today, Mark Sherman at the Associated Press, Stephen Dinan for The Washington Times, and Adam Liptak for The New York Times, who reports that “Justice Neil M. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am by Amy Howe
  In USA Today, Richard Wolf concludes that the Court’s four more liberal Justices “hijacked the Supreme Court this year – and already their conservative colleagues appear to be plotting revenge. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Richard Samp writes that in Nielsen v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Bill Mears at Fox News, Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Andrew Chung at Reuters, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, and Richard Wolf for USA Today. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:04 pm by Kali Borkoski
  Other coverage of, and commentary on, the grant in Hall comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences – who suggests that the case may entice the Court to “micromanage” the states’ procedures for determining retardation — and Andrew Cohen of The Atlantic, who predicts that the Court’s decision in the case will hinge on Justice Kennedy. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices also affirmed the lower court’s judgment in Washington v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Andrew Chung at Reuters, and Richard Wolf at USA Today. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf describes the other abortion restrictions “pending before or approaching the justices,” noting that “[i]t seems unlikely that the Supreme Court justices will be able to avoid all abortion cases for long – or even until the 2020 presidential election,” but  “[t]hat won’t stop them from trying. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on the recent Federalist Society convention in Washington honoring the late Justice Antonin Scalia, noting that nearly “all the judges on President-elect Donald Trump’s short list for the Supreme Court” were in attendance. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:15 am by James Romoser
Richard Wolf of USA writes that the court begins a new term “as both a divisive issue in the presidential election and the potential arbiter of it. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of Carpenter, which will be argued tomorrow, comes from Richard Wolf for USA Today and Mark Walsh for the ABA Journal. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Last week’s oral argument in in Trump v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first was in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:08 am by Amy Howe
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times weighs in on Kerry v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in one of the summary reversals, Dunn v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf recounts his personal experience with the RBG workout program, which “clearly showed that the justice keeps fit. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices ruled unanimously in Peter v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Richard Wolf at USA Today, Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, and Tony Mauro at Law.com (subscription or registration required) also covered the argument. [read post]