Search for: "United Parcel Service Company" Results 241 - 260 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 1:44 am
They have struck a similar deal with a Civils Company to install the services and receive payment at a later stage as a percentage of sales. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
On the subject of the judge's errors this Kat notes that the Court of Appeal, having found some errors in the trial judge's judgment, and that Lewison LJ, giving judgment for the Court, approved  the words of Lord Mance in Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23, approving a passage from the judgment of Clarke LJ in Assicurazioni Generali SpA v Arab Insurance Group [2002] EWCA Civ 1642: "...In some cases… [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 3:02 pm
A driver for United Parcel Service (UPS) in New York has complained to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alleging that her employer unlawfully discriminated against her when she was pregnant. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:00 pm by Nietzer
Obviously this problem extends to third party representatives who perform services in Italy. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:04 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
English: 16th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am by Kelly Ann Bird
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
§ 2000e(k) required United Parcel Service to provide pregnant workers (such as the plaintiff, Peggy Young) with light-duty work comparable to the accommodations UPS made for other employees. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:48 pm by WIMS
 Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here). 33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The patent department of the appellant is not a small unit where the cross-check mechanism may exceptionally be dispensed with (see T 428/98 [3.5]). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:18 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Neither Google nor United Parcel Service (UPS)  will be willing to comment on how the  consent decrees will impact their proposed merger. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:18 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Neither Google nor United Parcel Service (UPS)  will be willing to comment on how the  consent decrees will impact their proposed merger. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:18 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Neither Google nor United Parcel Service (UPS)  will be willing to comment on how the  consent decrees will impact their proposed merger. [read post]