Search for: "United States Army Corps of Engineers"
Results 241 - 260
of 906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Under the Clean Water Act (CWA), you cannot impact a federally protected stream or wetland unless you obtain a 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE).See 33 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:07 am
After the Court’s action, the Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA), along with 46 Senate co-sponsors, introduced a joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) that expands the scope of federal authority over land and waterways in the United States under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as WOTUS. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) that it could proceed under a series of general nationwide permits (NWPs) authorizing certain discharges, rather than applying to the Corps for an individual permit. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:20 am
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 2:53 pm
Army Corps of Engineers’ 2015 Clean Water Rule, rejecting the federal government’s arguments that federal courts of appeal have exclusive jurisdiction over such claims. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:25 am
BogueOn March 31, 2008, the EPA and the Corps issued a new final rule on compensatory mitigation for impacts to waters of the United States under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
Army Corps of Engineers’ new rulemaking redefining the scope of their jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm
Waters that Qualify as Waters of the United States Under Section (a)(1) of the Agencies’ Regulations by the Environmental Protection Agency From the introduction: "The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) "Guidance on Identifying Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act" guidance (Guidance) affirms that EPA and the Corps will continue to assert… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:51 am
” The EO took aim at the 2015 Army Corps of Engineers' rule (80 Fed. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:54 pm
Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:45 am
Thankfully, the US Army Corps brought the best minds in engineering into the fold. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineer officials regarding the Supreme Court's decision in Rapanos. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:27 am
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon issued a decision (pdf) invalidating the National Marine Fisheries Service's (NMFS) 2008 and 2010 biological opinions for operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) by the Army Corps of Engineers and Bureau of Reclamation after the parties to the litigation challenging those decisions filed cross-motions for summary judgment. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
The court ruled that the United States was liable because the flooding leading to the homeowners' damages was caused by negligent maintenance of a significant navigation channel by the US Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 6:48 pm
But a 2017 slideshow prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers staff shows that at least 18% of streams and 51% of wetlands nationwide would not be protected under the new definition of “waters of the United States,” or WOTUS, announced today. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (Oil Pipeline – Environmental Impacts)United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
