Search for: "United States District Court for the District of Montana"
Results 241 - 260
of 731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Issues Before the Supreme Court The Supreme Court granted certiorari and has agreed to consider the following question: “Whether it violates the religion clauses or the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution to invalidate a generally available and religiously neutral student-aid program simply because the program affords students the choice of attending religious schools. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Their ranks included workers who entered the United States illegally, according to two former members of the crew. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
The Supreme Court granted review to decide whether this violates the free exercise clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
” Twenty-two states and the District of Columbia impose throwback rules, under which sales of tangible property which are untaxable in the destination state are “thrown back” into the numerator of the origin state’s sales factor. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:54 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
Montana Department of Revenue, 18-1195 Issue: Whether it violates the religion clauses or the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution to invalidate a generally available and religiously neutral student-aid program simply because the program affords students the choice of attending religious schools. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
District Court Judge George Hazel ruled that new evidence in the case of a census citizenship question merits more consideration, opening the possibility the question could come before the Supreme Court again even after it rules as expected this month. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am
Taglieri went to federal court in the United States, seeking to have the baby returned to Italy; a federal district court granted his petition, finding that Italy was the baby’s habitual residence. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
The district court agreed with Intel, but the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am
The district court dismissed the case. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of Herrera v Wyoming An 1868 treaty between the United States and the Crow Tribe promised that in exchange for most of the Tribe’s territory in modern-day Montana and Wyoming, its members would “have the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon . . . and peace subsists . . . on the borders of the hunting districts. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:00 am
Essentially, no Americans try to emigrate out of the United States while millions of people from around the world try to immigrate to the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:25 am
(credit: Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images) On Friday, a federal judge in Montana District Court dealt the Trump Administration another setback pertaining to leasing out federal lands for fossil fuel extraction. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Montana order halting the construction and rejecting the previous special permit. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 5:11 am
United States of America. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:12 pm
Yet according to the district court, the plaintiffs, and (now) the United States, the entire ACA must fall if the individual mandate is unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:12 pm
Yet according to the district court, the plaintiffs, and (now) the United States, the entire ACA must fall if the individual mandate is unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 6:44 am
Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia use ad valorem taxes only, six states assess a flat surcharge, and three states levy both an ad valorem tax and a flat-dollar surcharge. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:04 am
Bullock, the court, with the chief in the majority, summarily overturned a Montana Supreme Court decision that had sought to distinguish a 1912 voter-approved state ban of corporate contributions from the federal restriction at issue in Citizens United v. [read post]
