Search for: "United States v. Clinton"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm
He flees to the United States, where he seeks asylum on the ground that he will be tortured if returned to Syria. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
Clinton No. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
President Obama publicly discussed his disagreement with the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Both Clinton and Obama had their chances to highlight this issue for their supporters and they just didn’t. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
’ Since the earliest days of the Republic, ‘every man’ has included the President of the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:01 am
The court's decision casts serious doubt on many of the measures currently in place, most notably in relation to the United States's own national security and surveillance activities, and thus raises new questions about how the European Union would continue to interact with the global digital economy. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
While declaring that, as the court held in Clinton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
” Citing Clinton and United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Spending over six pages detailing United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
They compared it to Clinton administration Solicitor General Drew Days’ famous mistake in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
”1 Since the earliest days of the Republic, “every man” has included the President of the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
Jsutice Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Gorsuch, concurred in the judgment, arguing that the standard for a state criminal subpoena should be the "demonstrated, specific need" test adopted by the Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As a measure of the historic rigor accompanying such agreements, prior to the Trump administration, the United States's only safe third country agreement was with Canada, a country whose rule-of-law institutions resemble those of the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:16 pm
Clinton v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
