Search for: "United States v. County of Nassau" Results 241 - 260 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
A Nassau County Criminal Lawyer said this court has reviewed the court file, transcripts, motion papers and memoranda, and this court vacates the defendant's conviction. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Supreme Court, Nassau County, granted the preliminary injunction, and the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599 A7936 Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598 A7905 Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597 A7892 Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in… [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 5:49 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of Maine 2009), and here is how it arose: On March 1, 2007, March 8, 2007, and April 14, 2007, Nassau County Detective Peter Badalucco, posing as a 14 year old teenager, `Chris’, received sexually suggestive emails from a person using the AOL screen name `FarlowMeCasa’, that included explicit sexual advances and a request for an in-person meeting. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Prior to trial, in an order dated August 26, 2004, the Supreme Court determined that the County was collaterally estopped from arguing that the road was not negligently designed based upon prior decisions of this Court in Furino v County of Nassau and Zawacki v County of Nassau. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The following statement in the Court's decision on the Defendants' motion for summary judgment rendered April 9, 1976 (at p. 2) is pertinent to this cause of action: "That portion of the original plaintiffs' action which alleges violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Federal Constitution is not being pressed in the light of the United States Supreme Court decision in San Antonio School District v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Considerations for Employees In the United States, employers generally are free to prospectively change an employee’s terms and conditions of employment, subject to compliance with contractual obligations and, where applicable, collective-bargaining restrictions. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:07 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Zohar Case Zohar v LaRock, 185 AD3d 987 [2d Dept 2020], was an appeal from a Short Form Order of Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 5 January 2009, the United States Attorneys' Office for the Southern District of New York filed a complaint against K charging him with extortion and stalking under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
It is our solemn duty to diligently guard these rights regardless of the crime charged, the reputation of the accused, or the pressure to convict (see Boyd v United States, 116 US 616, 635 [1886] [“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon”]). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:55 am
Judge Modifies Matrimonial Part Rules on Interim Counsel New York Law Journal Attorneys seeking pendente lite counsel fees in Part 18 of Nassau County's Matrimonial Center must orally argue their case, a New York judge has ruled, "to facilitate a prompt determination by the court. [read post]