Search for: "United States v. Democratic Executive Committee"
Results 241 - 260
of 675
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2020, 4:51 pm
United StatesSandvig v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am
For instance, the House Financial Services Committee has sided with credit unions, stating that retailers should be subject to the same rules as financial institutions. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court, opinion & dissent, 5/29/07 United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Barrett became a hero to many religious conservatives after her 2017 confirmation hearing for her seat on the court of appeals, when Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee – most notably, Sen. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
(capitalization in original) The President threatened by Tweet to issue an Executive Order to end the right to United States citizenship on the basis of birth in the United States guaranteed by the Constitution (the “Birthright”) and then criticized the legal experts who said that the Constitutional right could not be repealed without a Constitutional amendment. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
United States, the next year’s United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am
In a memorandum from Mitnick to Nielsen, Mitnick wrote: “Pursuant to your authority set forth in section 113 of title 6, United States Code, you have expressed your desire to designate certain officers of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in order of succession to serve as Acting Secretary. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am
But two new sources of information—the fifth volume of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt’s new book “Donald Trump v. the United States”—raise even more questions about the investigation. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
In 1947 in the case United Public Workers of America v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am
Clarke and Molly Saltskog discussed how the United States should react to Beijing and Tehran’s new partnership. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
To take the position that their decision is neither subject to review by a more democratically representative organ of state (however "wrong" they may be) strikes as odd in this context with human rights and democratic legitimacy at its core.3. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
As a consequence, the United States Supreme Court has refused to provide advisory opinions since 1793. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
United States, which upheld the constitutionality of the for-cause removal protection afforded to the FTC’s five commissioners, it narrowly read that decision to create an exception to the President’s unrestricted removal power only for “multimember expert agencies that do not wield substantial executive power. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:42 am
United States Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
United States that an act is legislative in nature if it is “an integral part of the deliberative and communicative processes by which Members participate in committee and House proceedings with respect to the consideration and passage or rejection of proposed legislation or with respect to other matters which the Constitution places within the jurisdiction of either House. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
” It follows the Trump v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:17 pm
For example, AEDPA only permits certain habeas relief if a lower-court decision violates "clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
