Search for: "United States v. Head" Results 241 - 260 of 6,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am by Christine Corcos
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 10:10 am
Why should you care about the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Court v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:06 am by Walter James
EPA, out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am by Kate Evans
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 1:05 pm
Celebrate by watching these videos discussing recent decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States: D.C. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
United States, No. 08-728, to address a question that has divided the courts of appeals regarding the operation of the Speedy Trial Act. 1. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 12:25 pm
 The United States may be headed by the former head of a reality show. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 9:17 am by Trevor Cutaiar
On August 3, 2016, the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Tundidor v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Ingrid Wuerth
  I explored those risks previously in a post about head of state immunity; many of the same arguments apply here as well. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 2:47 am by Scott Bomboy
A Ninth Circuit appeals court ruling may bring a question back to the Supreme Court about the ability to sue border agents at the United States-Mexico border for fatal shootings. [read post]