Search for: "United States v. Hurley" Results 241 - 260 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 pm by Howard Bashman
And you can access at this link the transcript of today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
" Boy Scouts built on a previous case—the unanimously decided Hurley v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am by Amy Howe
” At Mens Rea, the blog of the American Criminal Law Review, William Hornbeck argues that Chief Justice John Roberts should “restore the Chief Justice’s official title to ‘Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:40 am by Dale Carpenter
Hodges, the 2015 Supreme Court decision declaring a fundamental constitutional right of gay couples to marry, there have been hundreds of thousands of same-sex weddings in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, which asks whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act, comes from Ronald Mann. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Lawrence Hurley reports at Reuters that “[t]he U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:50 am by Matt Danzer
Tom Hurley, who begins by listing what has changed since the parties originally argued the underlying motion: First, President Obama admitted that the United States “tortured some folks,” presumably including Al-Nashiri. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court ruled 7-0 (without the participation of Justice Elena Kagan) that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
The case “could have big implications for parties that have an interest in the development or protection of the seafloors surrounding the United States — environmentalists and industry actors alike,” Smith writes. [read post]