Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 241 - 260
of 331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
Additional flexibility is provided by Article II(4), which provides that an offense shall be considered an extraditable offense whether or not the laws of the Parties place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; and whether or not the offense is one for which the Requesting State’s law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting… [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be considered an extraditable offense: whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; and whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation or use of the mails or of other facilities… [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that in determining whether an offense is an extraditable offense, the Contracting States: (1) shall consider only the essential elements of the offense punishable under the laws of both States and disregard that the respective laws do not place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology, and (2) shall not consider as an essential element of the offense… [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:00 am
(Extradition shall also be granted, Article 2 explains, for attempts and conspiracies to commit extraditable offenses, as well as for aiding and abetting the commission of such offenses.) [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The provisions of this Article apply whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires proof of an element, such as interstate transportation, the use of the facilities of interstate commerce, or the effects upon such commerce, [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on October 29, 1963. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:00 am
For the purpose of this Article, it shall not matter: (a) whether the laws of the Contracting Parties place the offense within the same category of offense or denominate the offense by the same terminology; or (b) whether the offense is one for which United States federal law requires proof of interstate transportation, or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or foreign commerce, such matters being merely for the purpose of… [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:59 pm
Sessions III issued a decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
The Article also provides that attempts and conspiracies to commit these offenses, and participation in the commission of the offenses, are extraditable. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:49 pm
The government alleged that he unlawfully introduced Supreme Greens into interstate commerce. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:14 am
Avionics was Ulti-Mate’s eastern United States’ sales representative. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The Status of Religious Arbitration in the United States and Canada Nicholas Walter Abstract: This paper discusses, and challenges, the status of religious arbitration in the United States and Canada. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
An offence shall also be an extraditable offence if it consists of an attempt or conspiracy to commit, or participation in the commission of, an extraditable offence. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
(3) Extradition shall also be granted for any offense against a federal law of the United States in which one of the offenses listed in the annexed Schedule, or made extraditable by paragraph (2) of this Article, is a substantial element, even if transporting, transportation, the use of the mails or interstate facilities are also elements of the specific offense. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 16, 1975. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
Second, we propose that employees engaged in interstate commerce can be terminated only if there is cause for the termination or severance pay given in lieu thereof. [read post]
