Search for: "United States v. Kerr" Results 241 - 260 of 1,329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2017, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), which considered whether federal immigration law preempted an Arizona state law designed to add extra state enforcement mechanisms. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm by Orin Kerr
I gather one consequence of my proposed approach would be that the Court would likely need to overturn United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
United States by Orin Kerr Third-Party Party-Crashing? [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:20 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States, the Supreme Court's big decision on the Fourth Amendment's "search" test. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 5:15 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Scott Anderson flagged his Lawfare@FP piece on the ambiguity in Trump’s announcement that that United States will recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:31 am by Orin Kerr
From that perspective Katz was something like United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:52 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) (records of dialed calls); United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:56 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
In part: The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an important electronic privacy case, United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Orin Kerr
Over at Lawfare, I recently put up a long post on a pending Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses last week’s oral argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:20 am by Vanessa Sauter
Yishai Schwartz provided an update on military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 1:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:32 pm by Benjamin Wittes
United States, a major Fourth Amendment case asking whether a warrant is necessary before law enforcement can obtain cell site data identifying a suspect phone's location from a service provider. [read post]