Search for: "United States v. Noble"
Results 241 - 260
of 403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Lord Puttnam said: “The amendments in my name and the names of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, the noble Baroness, Lady Boothroyd, and the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Scotland, do exactly what they say on the tin. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:04 pm
English: 16th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm
Brinker Affirms Continued Vitality of Wage and Hour Class Actions Oil refinery workers and ConocoPhillips Co. settled meal break claims for $15 million in United Steelworkers v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:52 pm
In the Oracle v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:30 am
by Jeremy Clare The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the district court exceeded its authority under 9 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
RUSK STATE HOSPITAL v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
Marbury v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
According to the Justice Department, the settlement is within the reaches of the public interest and provides effective and appropriate remedies for the antitrust violations alleged in the complaint, with respect to the settling defendants.On April 11, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division filed a complaint against Apple, Inc. and five of the six largest publishers in the United States for conspiring to fix the sales prices of electronic books or e-books. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:14 am
” - Alexander Keyssar, author of The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States Reviews “Hasen’s timely and factually rich account merits attention from jurists, policy specialists, and government reformers of all political stripes. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 4:18 pm
” In Matthew v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
The Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:55 am
Nobles, 69 F.3d 172, 188–89 (7th Cir.1995) (citing United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:24 am
United States consumers were harmed economically, in that the higher prices charged were part of $300 million in retail sales from the five publishers, including $40 million for e-books licensed through Apple’s iBookstore. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
Glover, they do not correctly state “the law as it stands in the United States”. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Secretary of State and J v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:28 pm
Amazon and Barnes and Noble are accepting pre-orders. [read post]
