Search for: "United States v. Obey"
Results 241 - 260
of 617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
” Once properly adjudicated to be unconstitutional, a statute is no longer the positive law of the United States and citizens need not obey it. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:19 pm
Supreme Court Decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Carvin of Jones Day in Washington (30 minutes), for the United States will be Solicitor General Elena Kagan (20 minutes), and for the Board will be Jeffrey A. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm
United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:36 pm
“The president, just like any other citizen of the United States, is bound by the law. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
United States, the purpose of the anti-commandeering doctrine is the “[p]reservation of the States as independent and autonomous political entities. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:41 am
United States. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:44 am
United States was whether farmers who sell their farm while in bankruptcy have to pay capital gains tax to the IRS. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:04 am
In Matter of the Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 2:51 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed this issue in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
Since the United States is a democratic country, one might say that the nation remains secure as long as threats to the People’s sovereignty over the United States remain at bay. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am
Perry – constitutionality of California’s “Proposition 8″ ban on same-sex marriage; also, question of standing to appeal Wednesday, March 27: 12-307 — United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Adam knew this long before United States District Judge James Zagel issued his ruling. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
(including Medellin), that American courts must find a way to obey the Convention that state officials had violated. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:03 am
" United States v. [read post]
