Search for: "United States v. Patrick"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
United States, in which the justices will consider whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm
United States, 530 U. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Her work focuses on the intersection of law, culture, media and technology in United States history. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:41 pm
This holding was summarized in United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 206 v G & K Services Canada Inc as follows, 94. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 1:07 pm
Here 's the abstract: In recent years, faith communities across the United States have begun to create affordable housing on church property, inspired by sincerely held religious beliefs. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The SCM Agreement and its predecessor, the Tokyo Subsidies Code were heavily influenced by the United States practice. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:04 pm
Rhode Island's Attorney General, Patrick C. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
The knowledgeable South Carolina product liability attorneys at the Patrick E. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
The knowledgeable South Carolina product liability attorneys at the Patrick E. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am
The United States and Canada are continuing their meetings this week to try to hash out a bilateral deal in renegotiating NAFTA that would be not only satisfactory to both but also consistent with the bilateral deal arrived at by the United States and Mexico in late August. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Says lawprof Neal Kumar Katyal, who is representing the state of Louisiana as it seeks to reopen the Supreme Court case Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
First, it creates an emergency exception allowing the government to continue targeting “roamers”—people lawfully targeted as non-United States persons located outside the United States, but who suddenly show up in the United States—for a brief period of time after they show up in the United States, so long as “a lapse in the targeting of such non-United States person poses a threat… [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:40 am
Radeker and modified in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
Eurodif (07-1059) and Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 7:29 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm
First, it creates an emergency exception allowing the government to continue targeting “roamers”—people lawfully targeted as non-United States persons located outside the United States, but who suddenly show up in the United States—for a brief period of time after they show up in the United States, so long as “a lapse in the targeting of such non-United States person poses a threat… [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm
Recently, a case was filed in the United States District Court of South Carolina, alleging that a deceased man’s civil rights had been violated after he died on the job. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm
Recently, a case was filed in the United States District Court of South Carolina, alleging that a deceased man’s civil rights had been violated after he died on the job. [read post]
