Search for: "United States v. Rivers" Results 241 - 260 of 1,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 11:16 pm by The Complex Litigator
This one entertains me becaues it faintly evokes the studio system of the 1930's and the decades of antitrust action by the FTC, with United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 4:01 am by Charles Sartain
The question in Rock River Minerals, LP and Carr v. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:26 pm by Unknown
(Land Into Trust; Easement; Intervention) United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
No “anti-arbitrating” presumption to resolving grievances alleging a violation of a collective bargaining agreementWatertown CSD v Watertown Education AssociationIndian River CSD v Indian River Education AssociationCourt of Appeals, Nos. 50 & 51, joint decision issued 93 NY2d 132In numerous decisions, New York State courts have frowned on the use of arbitration to settle disputes between public employers and unions unless the collective… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:25 am by Harry Styron
Failure to keep track of the name in which property is held can defeat a claim for assessments, as shown in River Oaks Homes Association v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm by Rick E. Rayl
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:23 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Lavallie (Indian Child Welfare Act - Concurrent Jurisdiction) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlJamul Action Committee v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 am
This post was authored by summer associate Reilly Wright In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:44 am by WIMS
When water flows from one portion of a river that is navigable water of the United States, through a concrete channel or other engineered improvement in the river constructed for flood and stormwater control as part of a municipal separate storm sewer system, into a lower portion of the same river, can there be a "discharge" from an "outfall" under the Clean Water Act, notwithstanding this Court's holding in South … [read post]