Search for: "United States v. Shine"
Results 241 - 260
of 371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2011, 8:23 pm
In addition, the United States' amicus brief also represents HUD's interpretation of the ILSA warranting Skidmore deference. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
–discussion of Economist article ‘Sinking Together: Italy’s Business Clusters’ (IP finance) Korea Hybrid patent system (Korea IP Law Blog) Montenegro Patent protection in Montenegro (IPKat) New Zealand New Zealand politicians speak out on ACTA (Michael Geist) Peru Toys that play without a trade mark – INDECOPI campaign checking marks and labelling of toys (IP tango) Poland Bad faith in trade mark applications (Class 46) San… [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
—Ralph Nader 1Kurach v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
” As the Museum of We the People, we bring the United States Constitution to life for visitors of all ages through interactive programs and exhibits. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:04 am
The Supreme Court ruled that these rights were secured by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the United States Constitution. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:09 am
Indeed, in Myers v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:47 am
It was opened for signature on September 27, 2018 at the United Nations. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
United States No. 17 – 2 has prompted the EU Commission to file an amicus curiae brief, an action which has been considered by Privacy Europe. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Scotland Scottish Legal News has a piece by Julie Hamilton, “Defamation, social media and the right to insult” United States Lawyer Alan Dershowitz has issued libel proceedings against another lawyer, David Boies accusing him of carrying out a “war of defamation” and “engaging in a sustained campaign to subvert the judicial process for purposes of disseminating outrageous, knowingly false and defamatory claims accusing Dershowitz of sexual abuse. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:36 pm
As a result, the United States Supreme Court now protects free speech more vigorously than any other judiciary in the world. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:04 am
(U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
(IPKat) United Kingdom IPO changes wording of Patent Rules (Out-Law) Online design registration – latest news (IPKat) (IPKat) PCC Page 37: The Octopus – keeping documents up its sleeve (PatLit) Neatly wrapped: UDR in the PCC: Albert Packaging & Ors v Nampak Cartons & Healthcare (JIPLP) Perplexing perpetual protection (not Peter Pan) (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent reform 2011: Vote scheduled at the… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 4:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 5:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
Cybersecurity of the Person, First Amendment Law Review, 2019, Jeff Kosseff, United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:36 am
Guido v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:58 am
v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm
” In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Troxel v. [read post]
