Search for: "United States v. That Certain Real Property" Results 241 - 260 of 1,383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2017, 7:43 am by Jon
Under the bill, the designation as an American citizen meant that one possessed certain specific rights, such as the right to make and enforce contracts, the right to file lawsuits and participate in lawsuits as parties or witnesses, and the right to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real property. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Class 99) (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Plane users can’t tell airlines from airways: United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited (IPKat) PPC page 32: Quickstep – are there difficulties changing course with 8 tentacles? [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
Yet the book's case for "free market" as opposed to "state" capitalism relies on generalizations that are too gross to capture the real fault lines in globalization. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Seneca County, New York (Real Property Taxes; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn the Interest of A.D. and Tr.D (Indian Child Welfare Act – Application) News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html In the Intergovernmental Section, we feature articles about recent United Nations meetings regarding the rights of Indigenous peoples. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 11:17 pm
Cal.; Aug. 3, 2009)] [link to opinion at Scribd].In October 2008 it was widely reported that the United States seized the "Mongols" trademark. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am by Fred Rocafort
It can be argued that someone who does not have the right to reside in the United States should not be allowed to buy property in the country. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Florian Mueller
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:09 am by Bob Eisenbach
Section 101(35A) of the Bankruptcy Code defines “intellectual property” for purposes of the protections of Section 365(n), using either general terms or references to provisions of the United States Code. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]