Search for: "United States v. Union National Bank"
Results 241 - 260
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
What the Latest Court Decisions Mean for Arbitrators, Employers, Unions and National Labor Policy? [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
United States United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
The Court will determine whether the Secretary of State can direct the Office of Communications (Ofcom) not to introduce regulations exempting certain wireless telegraphy equipment from a licensing requirement on national security grounds. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
For years, class actions following data breaches have been common in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
For years, class actions following data breaches have been common in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:20 am
United States (08-876) Argued: Dec. 8, 2009 Issue: Whether the “honest services” clause of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:05 am
In Vance v Union Planters Bank Corp., 279 F. 3d 295, [Cert. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm
Yet the allies are united at the United Nations, where the United States, France, Britain and Germany have urged the Security Council to investigate Iran's ballistic missile test from last week, which they argue violated the terms of a 2010 UNSC resolution banning Iran from conducting such tests. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
The case, Secretary of State for the Home Department v David Davis MP and others [2015] EWCA Civ 1185, has recently been referred by the Court of Appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union where the court asks the CJEU to rule on whether the ground-breaking case of Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources & Others, the case which ruled that European data retention laws were incompatible with Articles 7… [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
Hale ; associate editors, Gail V. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
Senior commission official Věra Jourová, in an official press release announcing the EU’s approval, stated: “We are talking here about a fundamental right of EU citizens that we have a duty to protect. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Petitioners International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), AFL-CIO ("the Union"), and individual Leo Andre Ahern seek review of the National Labor Relations Board ("the Board") decision1 finding that Ogihara America Corporation ("the Company") did not violate section 8(a)(1), (3) and (4) of the National Labor Relations Act ("the Act"), 29 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:15 am
“Foreign Body” includes the United Nations and any agency thereunder, the European Union and any agency thereunder, an international judiciary, the International Monetary Fund, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, the World Bank and the Socialist International. 2. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:35 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, arguing that “[p]ublic sector unions have been, and continue to be, a critical pathway to the middle class for women and people of color” and that “[a] Supreme Court ruling against unions in… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:42 pm
The tax loss to the U.S., the lawyer said, was about $60,000.The case is United States of America v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:42 am
Trump notably failed to reaffirm the United States’ commitment to NATO’s Article 5, promising mutual defense among allies, and instead castigated his fellow leaders for failing to adequately fund the alliance, suggesting incorrectly that the United States is owed money. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
If you care about the startup company ecosystem, I encourage you to give this question some thought and write the SEC. [1]Persons covered include (i) the issuer, (ii) any predecessor of the issuer; (iii) any affiliated issuer; (iv) any director, officer, general partner or managing member of the issuer; (v) any beneficial owner of 10% or more of any class of the issuer’s equity securities; (vi) any promoter connect with the issuer in any capacity at the time of such sale; (vii) any… [read post]
