Search for: "United States v. Warne" Results 241 - 260 of 5,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
" United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed, and Wyeth petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:06 pm by Walter Olson
Levine (20) Why wacky warnings matter (10) Vioxx: Mark Lanier’s smears of the Ernst v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
" Based on these parameters, the Court then concluded that the F.D.A.'s "warning letter" to the defendant did not justify the enhancement. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:53 pm
Approval of drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should not preempt any liability under state tort laws for pharmaceutical manufacturers, editors of the New England Journal of Medicine argue in a brief to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:10 pm
In a split decision, the Vermont Supreme Court affirmed, rejecting Wyeth's preemption argument.The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:39 pm
United States(1961) 368 U.S.208, 229 (Black, J., dissenting). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Coming back to Propecia, the warning label in the United States didn’t mention until June of this year, but the warning labels in the United Kingdom have said for some time: In addition, the following have been reported in postmarketing use: persistence of erectile dysfunction after discontinuation of treatment with PROPECIA; male breast cancer (see 4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use) Propecia in Sweden and Italy has similar… [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:15 pm by John C. Manoog III
The Defendant’s Basis for Certiorari Johnson & Johnson argued that the Massachusetts state courts’ opinions had been contrary to a prior decision of the United States Supreme Court (Wyeth v. [read post]