Search for: "United States v. Watson"
Results 241 - 260
of 521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
David Davis MP, Tom Watson MP and Others v the Secretary of State for the Home Department Today, the High Court found against the Government in David Davis’s and Tom Watson’s joint legal challenge to the Government’s emergency surveillance legislation. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:18 pm
That case, Watson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
Maine In Jones v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 8:36 am
Ed. 2d 130 (1996); Watson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
§ 271(e)(4)(B), Panacea be permanently enjoined from making, using, selling or offering to sell any of its accused products within the United States, or, where applicable, importing accused products into the United States prior to the expiration of the '703 and '325 patents;• That, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
In Re The Guardianship of C.M., N.W.M., T.W.; Virginia Watson and Howard Watson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:31 pm
Watson, The Decay of "Divers" and the Future of Charging "Under Divers Occasions" in Light of United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
The defendants filed their second notice of removal, and the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred the case to the District of Maine for inclusion in MDL No 268. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
On Wednesday, CAAF will hear United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
See White v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
United States (09-6338) — authority of federal judges, in setting a new prison sentence, to go below Guideline range Barber v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:55 am
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 629 F. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:41 am
In Watson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
I don’t know if my end-of-April prediction will hold true, but I do expect Neil Gorsuch to become a Justice on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Strauss's main point was to reassure readers that it really didn’t matter all that much that Article V made the United States Constitution so notably difficult to amend. [read post]
