Search for: "United States v. William Kennedy" Results 241 - 260 of 522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2020, 4:18 am by SHG
Historically, it is an accurate description of public square free speech issues in the United States from the 1950’s until today. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:01 am
According to the court (pages 20-21), the reason is that the Detention Treatment Act of 2005 declares that the term "United States," "when used in a geographic sense . . . does not include the United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
IFor publication opinions today (4): In United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
United States and Barber v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Edward Kennedy that he respected the precedent of Roe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is hard to see how.At least since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1943 ruling in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Doing so would let the state close, conservatively, 12 to 20 of its 112 prison units over the same period, saving hundreds of millions of dollars per year. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:30 am by Mark Walsh
United States, about the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause — to Thursday. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Kennedy v Cordia (Services) LLP (Scotland), heard 19 October 2015. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
In a December case, United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Kornreich, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Ret); Of Counsel, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer and Nelson, P.A. [read post]