Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 1" Results 241 - 260 of 2,495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This formula is of course an inversion of e pluribus unum (“from many, one”)—the motto for American democracy emblazoned on our money to provide as often a reminder to [property-owning] adherents of America’s “civil religion” of shared constitutional ideals, constitutional aspirations, constitutional faiths.[1] By making faiths plural, I am in part ceding the about-face that Sandy Levinson, former adherent, made in his Foreword to a new edition of his… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am by INFORRM
For example, the header to p. 8, which represents a summary of the responses to questions 1-7, is called ‘Evidence and Impact of SLAPPs litigation’ but by p. 14, which provides fuller details (or is meant to), ‘Evidence’ has dropped out of the picture altogether and the section is called ‘Impact on SLAPPs recipients’. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Section 40, combined with the Leveson recommendation of arbitration, has the effect of levelling the playing field between claimants and defendants in media cases. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 10:17 am by Daniel S. Blynn
That makes some sense given that the “Settlement Class” is defined to be “[a]ll persons,” without geographic limitation, who received a marketing text message from the defendant since July 1, 2021 (emphasis added). [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 1:56 pm by LawRank
But, we have some additional tips for creating professional responses to unfavorable client reviews. 1. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
Sandvik has made a career of helping journalists cloak their identities online, defending news organizations from hackers and developing tools so reporters can communicate with sources securely. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
  It introduces a hitherto unknown acronym “SLAPAP” – which does not appear elsewhere in the document and appears to be a typo for “SLAPP”. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:12 am by Rohini Kurup, Jonathan Shaub
Instead, given the evidence from the recent brief on immunity, past OLC experience, and ongoing arguments in the Bannon trial, the distinction between Navarro and Meadows/Scavino may be driven not by obscure constitutional doctrines about the power of Congress to subpoena White House advisers, but by the foundational question all prosecutors ask before bringing a case: “Can we convict this defendant? [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Four Myths about Biotech Securities Cases   As discussed in our original article, these findings overturn several longstanding myths about this subset of securities class actions:   Myth #1: Cases against biotech companies for failed clinical trials or products that are not approved by the FDA are risky and expensive. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:00 am by Chong Xiang
However, the challenge is: how can we mask out the patch, especially when the patch location is unknown? [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But it overturned the $1 million in damages because there was no evidence of actual confusion. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
They also assert that the defendants will suffer no prejudice if Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 are permitted to pursue their claims anonymously, as counsel has identified their names to counsel for defendants. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
IPSO 01429-22 Hopkins v cornwalllive.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 00640-22 Longstaff v The Northern Echo, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 10762-21 Peer v thesundaytimes.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 11818-21 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, 9 Reporting of crime (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 11928-21 Tierney v… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Doe (E.D.Pa.): Because the Defendant's identity was unknown, the original Complaint identified him only by his IP address. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
On 1 July 2022, summary judgment was given in favour of the defendants in Haviland v Lownie [2022] EWHC 1688 (QB) by Murray J. [read post]