Search for: "Verizon, Inc."
Results 241 - 260
of 843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Verizon New York, Inc. 14-439Issue: (1) Whether the exhaustion requirements of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:45 pm
., Western Union Co. and Verizon Communications Inc., according to Yerger. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:32 am
Baidu.com Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 9:40 pm
Citrix Systems, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:10 pm
Verizon New York, Inc., fka New York Telephone Company 14-439 Issue: (1) Whether the exhaustion requirements of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:51 pm
Verizon Business, Inc. (10th Cir., November 25, 2014) (upholding summary judgement in favor of Verizon on Mr. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 2:21 am
Cox Communications was the one major player absent from the deal struck between the content owners and service providers back in 2011, the Copyright Alert System which did involved the likes of Cablevision, Comcast, Time Warner and Verizon. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 6:32 pm
Verizon New York, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
Plaintiffs East End Eruv Association, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
Plaintiffs East End Eruv Association, Inc. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 6:53 pm
By Caleb Skeath Last Friday, the FCC announced that it intends to fine two telecommunications carriers — TerraCom, Inc., and YourTel America, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:52 am
Editor’s Note: This blog post was originally published on September 2, 2014, courtesy of iMedia Connection’s Blog. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:12 pm
Verizon New York, Inc., 66 A.D.3d 960, 961, 888 N.Y.S.2d 136, 137-38 (2nd Dept. 2009), and in Wartski v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:12 pm
Verizon New York, Inc., 66 A.D.3d 960, 961, 888 N.Y.S.2d 136, 137-38 (2nd Dept. 2009), and in Wartski v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 11:41 pm
Some of that excitement ended with the Supreme Court’s 2004 case of Verizon Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday said a lower court judge erred in dismissing the claims, after the workers had answered "none" when asked if they had been "diagnosed" with ailments, injuries or diseases.These workers were employed by cleaning companies hired by Verizon Communications Inc, Brookfield Properties and dozens of other owners of downtown Manhattan buildings damaged or destroyed in the attacks, the court said. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
., Big Lots Inc., International Game Technology, Boston Properties Inc., Abercrombie and SLM Corp. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm
It should be noted that the Board is currently considering the issue of whether employees should have a right to use an employer’s email to engage in protected activity in Purple Communications, Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
Apr. 2, 2010); In the Matter of the Search of Yahoo, Inc., Crim. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:50 am
Accordingly, the appeals court also vacated the lower’s court’s judgment insofar as it granted in part Verizon’s motion for summary judgment on her retaliation claim (Moll v Telesector Resources Group, Inc dba Verizon Services Group, July 24, 2014, Walker, J, Jr). [read post]
