Search for: "Vermont v. Congress" Results 241 - 260 of 426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2021, 10:17 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
(As noted above, Congress has appropriated an additional $250 million to this program, which we will look at more closely in our next installment.) [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:42 am by Jessica Arons
The Supreme Court’s ruling today, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Copyright Office is obviously interested in minimizing the ongoing burden of the exemption proceedings, and enthusiastic about getting Congress to at least let it make permanent exemptions so that it doesn’t have to redo all this work every three years. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Meghan Downey
” But the Supreme Court in Little Sisters rejected this “open-mindedness test,” referring to a prior decision in Vermont Yankee v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:59 am by Big Tent Democrat
As we move forward with preparations for the second Supreme Court nomination of this Congress, I am reminded of the Vermont marble inscribed above the entrance of the Supreme Court which pledges ? [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:56 am by Courtney Finerty-Stelzner
Pinellas Hematology & Oncology, P.A., 21 F.4th 1288, 1308 (11th Cir. 2021) (quoting Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
  Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Martial Law Would Sweep the Country Into a Great Legal Unknown By Stephen Dycus, Professor of Law, Vermont Law School and William C. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm by WIMS
EPA published the Endangerment Finding in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:44 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
That wasn’t the intent of Congress, the Court concluded, ruling that “Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them. [read post]