Search for: "Vote v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 9,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Hirst v United Kingdom (No2), the ‘original’ prisoner voting case from 2005, was ruled upon first by a Chamber, and then successfully referred to the Grand Chamber, by the United Kingdom, using the procedures described above. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:56 am by Amy Howe
” One of the provisions at the heart of the case, Brnovich v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
This week is going to be remembered for another definition of the Waters of the United States, commonly known as WOTUS, being struck down by a federal court. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:58 am
The California State Bar Act imposes a duty on attorneys to "support the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this state". [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:12 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, admitting its "approach is not without difficulties. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:56 pm by Lawrence Solum
Blackmun Papers at the Library of Congress have provided a wealth of information about the United States Supreme Court and its landmark decisions. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:42 pm by Josh Blackman
The post Noah Feldman is Haunted By Justice Scalia's Vote in <i>Bush v. [read post]
Voter authentication is among the most controversial aspects of voting in the United States and will likely continue to be no matter the voting system put in place. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:59 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The BBC reports that the Twitter alternative Parler has become the most-downloaded app in the United States as conservatives flock to the self-styled “free speech” app after the US election. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by Federalist Society
The question in this case was whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by Federalist Society
The question in this case was whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:02 am
Instead, it is a unanimous opinion stating: "Instant Runoff Voting as adopted in Minneapolis is not facially invalid under the United States or Minnesota Constitution, and does not contravene any principles established by this court in Brown v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 2:48 pm
On June 29, 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided Cuomo v. [read post]