Search for: "Vote v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 9,417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 9:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am
Trump v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
In South Africa v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
United States and, most recently, in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
Reed then explicitly rejects the Lederman view, in a discussion which concludes: The United States is a constitutional democracy. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation In a House of Commons debate on the Government’s plan to scrap the last element of the Leveson reform scheme left on the statute books, Labour members voted for an amendment aimed at preventing the complete repeal of section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
It was filed in early September 2023 by six Colorado residents eligible to vote in that state’s Republican primary. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am
" Another may examine the suggestion that even if Trump is constitutionally disqualified from being President of the United States, that does not mean he is constitutionally ineligible to be elected as President of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
” Still he did find some other claims made by South Africa to be plausible: “My decision to vote in favour of the measures indicated rests on the plausible claim by South Africa that certain statements by Israeli State officials, including members of its military, give rise to a real and imminent risk of irreparable prejudice to the rights of Palestinians under the Genocide Convention …. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:03 am
The court relied heavily on In re Hubbard, In Hubbard, the Eleventh Circuit relied heavily on United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
House of Representatives and the Senate already have determined that Donald Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021 “warrants … disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. [read post]
