Search for: "WEEKS v. JOHNSON "
Results 241 - 260
of 2,326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 9:06 am
From People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 11:58 am
” This test originated in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm
Johnson (Assimilative Crimes Act) The Shawnee Tribe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 8:30 am
” Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
This week we have five new relists. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:11 pm
The justices called for the federal government’s views in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
These and other petitions of the week are below: Thacker v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:57 am
Lund (University of Southern California), on Tuesday, January 11, 2022 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Each of them is fascinating on its own terms; I give them brief treatment only because there is such an embarrassment of riches this week. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 6:46 am
Abram and Schmerber v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 1:09 pm
KC Johnson for the pointer. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 9:27 am
The case of Crawford v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 12:01 am
Johnson. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"] Last week, the Fifth Circuit decided Williams v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:25 am
All employees under covered contracts must be fully vaccinated by Jan. 18, 2022, meaning two weeks after receiving the second dose of either the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine or the single dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. [read post]
