Search for: "WMATA"
Results 241 - 255
of 255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 11:57 am
WMATA is not insured by an independent insurance company; rather, it is self-insured. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:59 am
WMATA is a quasi-governmental agency, also known as Metro. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
Meanwhile, Plaintiffs filed their lawsuit against WMATA on March 25, 2004. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 10:35 pm
WMATA will also pay Jones $47,324 and will pay $2,500 each to two other individuals who were refused an accommodation to depart from the Authority's uniform policy. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:48 pm
WMATA should say yes. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
What nerve does the WMATA have to impose such a drastic change as random subway and bus searches, apparently with no notice or comment period for the public to put in its two cents in advance? [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:10 am
Suing on behalf of Gloria Jones, a member of the Apostolic Pentecostal faith, the complaint alleges that WMATA violated its obligation to accommodate religious beliefs when it refused to hire Jones because her religious views require her to wear long skirts. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
Martha's family had initially sued the WMATA for $50 million. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
Martha's family had initially sued the WMATA for $50 million. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:10 pm
Mineta, 319 F.Supp.2d 69 (D.D.C. 2004), that the D.C. area Metropolitan Area Transit Authority unconstitutionally prohibited pro-marijuana advertisements in subway stations, where WMATA's decision was based on federal legislation prohibiting such advertisements in transit systems. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Mineta, 319 F.Supp.2d 69 (D.D.C. 2004), that the D.C. area Metropolitan Area Transit Authority unconstitutionally prohibited pro-marijuana advertisements in subway stations, where WMATA's decision was based on federal legislation prohibiting such advertisements in transit systems. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 10:05 am
WMATA, 112 F.3d 1207, 1213 (D.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:42 pm
”The court took a dim view of WMATA’s failure to suspend the automatic deletion feature, finding it “indefensible. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 10:24 am
Specifically, plaintiffs sought an order requiring WMATA to produce backup tapes of certain electronic documents written and received since the filing of the lawsuit. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 12:44 am
WMATA then filed a petition for judicial review. [read post]
