Search for: "WSJ Staff"
Results 241 - 260
of 896
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 5:10 am
Byline: WSJ Custom Content Studios for Brand [X].Steinberg: we use brand logo, “presented by. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 9:15 am
The full list, published by the staff of Congress's Joint Committee on Taxation, includes many benefits you... [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 10:48 am
Like other employees, compliance staff can under various statutes submit information on potential wrongdoing for whistleblower awards or claim retaliation for raising concerns about alleged wrongdoing. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:13 am
Securities and Exchange Commission are conducting an investigation of the SEC's New York office for the possibility of improper investments.According to Reuters, investigators are checking whether the employees' investments comply with SEC internal rules that prohibit trading shares of companies under investigation.The article claims that the investigation appears limited to the New York office of the securities regulator, and there is no indication of widespread flouting of the rules, according to… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 12:16 pm
However, the Times offers a steep 50% College Rate discount for students, faculty and staff with a valid .edu email address. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
The WSJ article notes the President has 38,258,000 (more after the article was published) followers on Twitter. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:04 am
WSJ Law Blog. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:09 am
” In addition, the ways that different companies staff their operations will also make company to company comparisons difficult. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:16 pm
Commission staff were challenged to debate Mr. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:06 am
The WSJ article indicates that the rules requirements will be less onerous than what is contemplated by Dodd-Frank, allowing issuers to take the statistical sampling approach to determining median employee pay that some pre-rulemaking commenters had thoughtfully suggested. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:06 am
The WSJ article indicates that the rules requirements will be less onerous than what is contemplated by Dodd-Frank, allowing issuers to take the statistical sampling approach to determining median employee pay that some pre-rulemaking commenters had thoughtfully suggested. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:00 pm
WSJ I know that just breaks your heart that someone earning $174,000 will have to give up their lush benefits and feed at the trough with the rest of us. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:20 am
Currently, 10 percent of the agency's non-management staff telecommutes two days a week, Gilman said in an e-mail responding to questions about the agreement. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm
[WSJ Law Blog] * A follow-up on a previous item, checking in on the status of the petition to save the federal defenders one week in. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 5:34 am
According to this WSJ article, a PwC survey notes that companies are not making a whole lot of progress on conflict minerals: "Two-thirds of respondents to a new survey say their companies are in the early stages or have not yet started compiling information needed to meet the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission's conflict minerals reporting law.... [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
Hille and Aglionby reported that “GSK said it had conducted an internal four-month investigation after a tip-off that staff had bribed doctors to issue prescriptions for its drugs. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:19 am
Besides the memos I am posting in our "SEC Enforcement" Practice Area, here are related articles: - Lane Powell's Doug Greene's "SEC's Shift in No-Admit-or-Deny Policy Would Create Dilemma for Defendants if Applied in Close Cases" - WSJ's "SEC Gets Set to Test Policy for Guilt Admissions" - WSJ's "Where the SEC Action Will Be" - CNBC's "Admitting Guilt or Heftier Fines? [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:20 am
The Staff will be developing guidance regarding the types of cases that would require admissions of guilt. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 4:13 am
At three-peater Nabor Industries, two comp committee members failed to receive majority support and tendered their resignations, which were not accepted by the board - and as noted in this WSJ article, the company engaged in some shady vote counting on its proxy access proposal. [read post]
8 May 2013, 3:05 pm
” In general the WSJ interview portrays Watt as trying to avoid controversy, not surprising for a high-level nominee awaiting confirmation hearings. [read post]
