Search for: "Wai v. Parks" Results 241 - 260 of 4,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm by Phil Dixon
When two officers arrived on scene, the man was outside next to a car in the parking lot. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm by Zoe Stern
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am by Kurt R. Karst
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The notice sets out that the SRA will consider an NDA has been improperly used where: it prevents, or seeks to impede or deter, a person from: co-operating with a criminal investigation or prosecution; reporting an offence to a law enforcement agency; reporting misconduct, or a serious breach of regulatory requirements to a regulatory or supervisory body; making a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998; it is intended to influence the substance of such a report,… [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:43 pm by Rudolf J. Karvay
One powerful way to support New York’s arts and culture sector is through planned giving. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
But if you've got a $45 million aircraft parked in California, you've got to pay taxes on it.So on December 28, 2016, Mr. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 Last week in the courts On 4 April 2023, judgement on costs was handed down by Justice Murray in the case of Parkes v Hall and Earnshaw [2023] EWHC 794 (KB). [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Scott Bomboy
In 2011, the state Supreme Court of Washington ruled in State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “The occupier of a park owes a duty to its visitors to take reasonable care to provide reasonably safe premises – safe in the sense of danger of personal injury or damage to property. [read post]