Search for: "Wales v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 12:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
  At the lower court, the defendants also argued that Wood’s claimed invention was not new, having been known and used by numerous individuals in England, Wales, Canada and the United States prior to Wood’s alleged invention, but that issue was left moot by the decision that the specification was insufficient. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
In this sense, there is probably no need to recall the (endless) series of references for a preliminary ruling on national private copying exceptions and, a few months ago, the decision in Soulier, C-301/15 [here and - particularly - here], just to mention a couple of examples.Now comes a further CJEU ruling in which this trend is once again visible.Earlier this week, the Court issued its judgment in ITV Broadcasting v TVCatchup, C-275/15 (TV Catchup 2), a… [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:17 am by Florian Mueller
Originally, Nokia sued in two countries -- the United States and Germany -- in late April and early May 2012. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
In recent days, President Trump has declared that he would have the United States withdraw from the Paris climate accord. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
In recent days, President Trump has declared that he would have the United States withdraw from the Paris climate accord. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
In recent days, President Trump has declared that he would have the United States withdraw from the Paris climate accord. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
BBC Wales reports that it has been told by a UKIP general election candidate that she is planning to sue the party for libel and harassment. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Robert L. Mues
England is trying to catch up with Ohio and the rest of the United States when it comes to Family Law. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Also on Wednesday it will hear the appeal of Youssef v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs involving whether the Foreign Secretary was entitled to allow Mr Youssef to be added to the United Nations’ list of people subject to asset freezing. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The draft resolution called on the United States to investigate the alleged war crimes and human rights violations disclosed by WikiLeaks. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:29 am by Peter Hirtle
  That copy was included in the Keneally papers purchased by the State Library of New South Wales. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:32 am by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, a thought leader on FRAND since his landmark Microsoft v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
In 1964 the US Supreme Court as New York Times Co v Sullivan (1964) 376 U.S. 254 recognised that the First Amendment applied to state laws on defamation. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
United Kingdom” refers to England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:38 am
The United States must do the same for its children. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
IPSO 01232-24 Worgan v Wales on Sunday, 1 Accuracy, 2 Privacy, 6 Children, No breach – after investigation 01552-24 Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 22450-23 Daniel v Daily Record, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 01561-24 Kelly v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy, 12 Discrimination, 3 Harassment, No breach – after investigation 01690-24… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]