Search for: "Ware v. Ware"
Results 241 - 260
of 631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
Yesterday the Tenth Circuit heard oral arguments in Bonidy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
In 1937, in Waring v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:05 pm
Meyer, Employer Handbook] “You’re NOT Paranoid — The Agencies ARE Ganging Up” [Dabney Ware, Foley & Lardner] “The U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:07 pm
V. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 2:29 pm
With respect to goods(wares), a trademark is deemed to be used if: the trademark is marked on the goods; the trademark is otherwise associated with the goods in the mind of the purchaser; the trademark is marked on the goods’ package; the trademark is marked on the goods or the goods’ packaging, if the goods are exported from Canada. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm
Twentieth Century Fox case where the Court explained that “origin of the goods” in the Lanham Act means “the source of wares… [i.e.] the producer of the tangible product sold in the marketplace” (at 31). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 2:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
The law does not demand good faith from a seller in “those vague commendations of his wares which manifestly are open to difference of opinion,” said Justice Holmes in Deming v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 pm
In this week’s case (ICBC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:42 pm
It is much easier to complacently offer the same product or service for a highly-profitable price than to constantly refine your wares and cut prices to attract and keep customers. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:32 am
From Thursday’s Desertrain v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:45 am
According to FINRA Department Of Enforcement, Complainant, v... [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:01 am
Also see Ware v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:01 am
Also see Ware v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Judge Waring’s work also includes introducing black jurors to juries in Charleston and mandating equal pay for black and white teachers. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:35 pm
Nakamura v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:52 pm
We will not be the first to comment on the Eighth Circuit’s affirmance earlier this week of summary judgment in Boehm v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:43 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
