Search for: "Washington v. Com." Results 241 - 260 of 338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
Last summer, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
. --- SanDiego6.com, February 24, 2010 McClellan-Palomar Airport in Carlsbad, California will close alternating weeks starting April 25, when work will begin to replace the 5,000-foot-long runway. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Simply stated, what motivates much public interest regulation is a simple desire by some here in Washington to tell the American people what’s best for them. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  One study back in the 60’s showed that in the years after Mapp v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Washington, and severed those provisions from the sentencing statutes. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm by Eric
* The NYT catalogs an impressive roster of futility for US dot coms trying to compete in China. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
The only significant decision out of Washington last week was Smith v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Washington because it required judicial factfinding. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:53 am
Last year in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
” [28] Therefore, the coach caused injury to my client. [29] Some have also fought to attach liability to coaches for injuries resulting from the failure to properly teach their players to, for example, slide or dive for a ball. [30] Furthermore, the State of Washington introduced a law known as the Zachery Lystedt Law, named after a 13-year-old football player who suffered a severe and debilitating concussion in an eight-grade football game after having been allowed to return to… [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:18 am
Washington had overruled Harris. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 1:59 am
A federal judge in Washington has denied a motion by Internet radio aggregator Live365.com to preliminarily enjoin the operation of the Copyright Royalty Board on the grounds that its judges are appointed in violation of the US Constitution. [read post]