Search for: "Wells v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2009, 4:52 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2009 WL 1688474 (E.D.Pa. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 504 F.Supp.2d 939, 947 (S.D.Cal.2007) (noting split of authority but finding that, with recent Proposition 64 reforms, the UCL now requires reliance); Anunziato v. eMachines, Inc., 402 F.Supp.2d 1133, 1137-39 (C.D.Cal.2005) (declining to read a reliance requirement into the UCL); In re Tobacco II Cases, 146 P.3d 1250 (2006) (granting petition for review on issue of whether UCL requires reliance); Def.'s Opp'n n.… [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:17 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., which required the Second District Court of Appeal to determine whether a plaintiff’s military records were discoverable in his personal injury case. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2010 WL 1790864, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:02 am by Matt C. Bailey
LEXIS 86769, at 26-28.In certifying the subclass, the Court rejected the defendant’s argument that the Supreme Court’s decision Wal-Mart precluded a finding of commonality based solely on the testimony of the discrict managers alleged de facto policy: The Court also rejects defendants' argument that the recent Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:18 am by Steve Baird
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:35 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. to shield it from class-related discovery requests, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elana James of the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:05 pm by The Complex Litigator
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc), the trial court applied essentially identical standards and correctly decided the issue. [read post]