Search for: "West v. Price" Results 241 - 260 of 951
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Initially, the NBAM covers eight states: California, Utah, Minnesota, Tennessee, North Carolina, West Virginia, Massachusetts, and Maine. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Telegram TRO   Dating back to as early as 2014, the SEC began bringing enforcement actions relating to cryptocurrency, and with its October 11, 2019 filing of SEC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:07 pm by Goldberg Jones
This is a contributing factor as to why community property states are predominantly in the West —the exception being Wisconsin. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Andrew Hamm
The petitions of the week are below the jump: 7 West 57th Street Realty Company, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:41 am by Caroline Shaw
Unexpected, to me at least, was a regular acceptance, among politicians, lawyers, and journalists alike, that defamation law was the necessary price to pay for a freer press: censure, rather than censorship. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Note: The author thanks Brittany Moore for contributing to statutory research for this piece. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 5:32 pm
BP West Coast Products, LLC—against BP West Coast Products on behalf of over two million consumers who were overcharged on their debit cards when buying BP gasoline. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Kevin Kaufman
A portion of the law was recently reversed in the court case Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am by Francis Pileggi
Apr. 16, 2019), the Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s holding that “unaffected market price” was the fair value on the date of the merger. [read post]