Search for: "White v. Perry"
Results 241 - 260
of 309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
Cooper was ready with a precedent of his own, the Court’s 1982 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
Office of Personnel Management and Perry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
For fans of baseball, the appeal of Perry v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
V. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Whiting, et al., with Carter G. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm
And in Perry v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am
Regular Readers here will recall that I have been critical of Governor Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Brown for not offering a spirited defense of Prop. 8 in the case of Perry v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:41 am
Rick Perry shortly before the execution, but Mr. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm
I did not expect zip out of the Supreme Court or Governor Perry. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:42 am
The ruling in New Hampshire v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Hart, Jr, (describing Perry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In the Perry v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:54 am
The defendant City, however, did not call its designated experts David Hall (economist), Gene Perry (life care planner), or Charles Small, Ph.D. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, and both sides have vowed to take Perry v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:09 pm
The case that gave the Justices the greatest difficulty was Perry v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 pm
Men have it easy compared to women: they don’t have to ponder the great Pantsuit v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:49 am
District Court in Santa Ana, California by Judge James V. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:48 am
Regina v White; Regina v Dennard; Regina v Perry; Regina v Rowbotham [2010] EWCA Crim 978; [2010] WLR (D) 120 “For the purposes of tobacco smuggling cases there was unlikely to be any incompatibility between the rules which made those liable under the Excise Goods (Holding, Movement, Warehousing and REDS) Regulations 1992 or the Tobacco Products Regulations 2001 to pay duty and those made liable by Council Directive 92/12/EEC. [read post]
