Search for: "Wiley v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
I’ve written about Kirtsaeng before, see also More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley, What Kirtsaeng Won’t Answer, The United States “Odd” Kirtsaeng Argument, and Overturn Quality King? [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 10:37 am
The facts are as follows: Supap Kirsaeng came to the United States as a college student in 1997. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:14 am
John Wiley and Sons, Inc. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am
(I briefly discussed this idea in More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons.) [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 10:56 am
The case cite is Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:10 am
In other words, the case deals with the fate of all copies that the U.S. copyright owner made, or licensed to be made, and which happened to have been made anywhere other than in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:12 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., a case involving the applicability of U.S. copyright law to copies of works created and legally acquired abroad and subsequently imported into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:12 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., a case involving the applicability of U.S. copyright law to copies of works created and legally acquired abroad and subsequently imported into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Court considered whether copyrighted works made and purchased abroad can be bought and sold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Millions sold in the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
Wiley argues that because Title 17 does not have extraterritorial application, “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States pursuant to Title 17. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 7:25 am
Wiley will be argued today at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am
That’s the issue tackled by the 2nd District in State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 4:00 pm
That makes Wiley v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
This involves parallel importation of text books into the United States that were legitimately manufactured abroad. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
This fall term, the United States Supreme Court will hear Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
