Search for: "Wiley v. Wiley"
Results 241 - 260
of 840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 4:36 am
To Fee or Not to Fee: Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons — I have a post at CaseText discussing last week’s Supreme Court decision in Kirtsaeng II, which held that courts should focus on the objective reasonableness of parties’ litigation positions but consider all other relevant factors when determining whether to award attorney’s fees. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:02 pm
Wiencek v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
John Wiley & Sons, in which the Court weighed in on the standard for fee-shifting under the Copyright Act, and concludes that the decision “does not break much new ground. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:28 am
Supreme Court ruled in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:50 am
Wiley won both at the district and appellate court levels; and the Supreme Court’s prior First Sale/importation precedent (the Costco v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:06 am
This entry is a follow up to a previous blog article that discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:06 am
This entry is a follow up to a previous blog article that discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:18 am
” Opinion analysis: Court clarifies availability of fee awards in copyright cases — Yesterday, the Supreme Court released its decision in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, which is an iteration of its 1994 Fogerty v Fantasy decision providing guidance on what courts should look at when determining whether to award attorney’s fees to prevailing parties in copyright cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am
John Wiley & Sons, in which the Court weighed in on the standard for fee-shifting under the Copyright Act, comes from Ronald Mann for this blog. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:39 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for a unanimous Court in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:25 pm
John Wiley & Sons (Art Lien) Thursday morning brought the first decision from the April argument session, Justice Elena Kagan’s opinion for a unanimous Court in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:36 am
Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:30 am
The case the justices decided Thursday (PDF) concerns the fallout from Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am
John Wiley & Sons Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:56 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:21 am
by Dennis Crouch In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:03 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 15-375. [read post]
12 May 2016, 12:25 pm
On April 25, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments inKirtsaeng v. [read post]
