Search for: "William D Marshall" Results 241 - 260 of 595
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 7:43 pm
The argument is built on the indictment of the "mistakes of recent decades" from the Marshall Plan to the creation of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, to the development of multilateral mechanisms to eliminate trade barriers and the like are now recharacterized as a parade of horribles that turned a mighty nation into a foolish spendthrift that negotiated away its patrimony to aid others while impoverishing itself. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:34 am by Diane Marie Amann
Candidate in Law, Católica Global School of Law, Lisbon, Portugal, Theorizing the Victim-Agent: A Response to the “Ideal” Victim of Trafficking ◄ Milena Sterio, Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Academic Enrichment, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University, Ohio, The Karadzic Genocide Conviction: Inferences, Knowledge and Intent ► Moderator: Lesley Wexler, Professor of Law, University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign C.7. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:05 am by SHG
But nobody suspected that William O. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 6:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
He told Williams he knew "more than you think I know," including that Williams had been in a neighbor's backyard, not just walking past it. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am by Randy Barnett
Back on May 6th on Balkinization, Harvard law professor Mark Tushnet had some advice for “liberals” entitled: Abandoning Defensive Crouch Liberal Constitutionalism. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 5:16 am by Eugene Volokh
(Some people claim it is too oligarchic, in which case they’d say America isn’t democratic enough — but again they’d be distinguishing democracy from oligarchy.) [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 1391(d), confirmed that where a corporation “resides” is where it is incorporated. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am by Alex Loomis
§ 949a(b)(3)(D), and that rule of evidence and law violate the confrontation clause. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 8:06 am by James Bopp and Richard Coleson
Absent such restricting rules, courts may (per Justice John Marshall Harlan) “roam[] at large in the constitutional field. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:19 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
Ballard, Vice President and Director, First Iowa State Bank, Albia, IA Menzo D. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by JB
  The central purpose is to get them to think about the difference between (a) the history of political practice; (b) tradition; (c) convention;  (d) legal obligations; and (e) judicially enforceable legal obligations.I would be delighted if Judge Garland--a outstanding jurist--were elevated to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
” Justice Thurgood Marshall embraced a competing vision; it “refused to acquiesce to outdated notions of ‘liberty. [read post]