Search for: "Williams v. Barrett" Results 241 - 260 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
Justin Mack for the Indianapolis Star and Ron Maxey for Memphis Commercial Appeal cover Judge Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
With the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who provided a necessary vote to the McGirt majority, and the confirmation of her replacement, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the state is now asking the court to reverse itself. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Plaintiffs' purported equitable cause of action, based only on an ultra vires claim, would have been unknown to William Blackstone, Chancellor Kent, or Justice Story. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm by Rick Hills
SCOTUS has not decided this question, preferring to resolve the issue on statutory grounds in Department of Commerce v House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999). [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
   Even in Chapter Two -- where I unapologetically set out the sophisticated constitutional theory advanced in the postwar era by political scientists/philosophers like Willmoore Kendall, Martin Diamond, and Harry V. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
The “independent state legislature” theory first made an appearance at the Supreme Court in a concurring opinion by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin Russell
There are, however, regular exceptions, such as Williams v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm by Pace Law School Library
Apollo Energies, Inc., 611 F.3d 679, 2010.) 38 Ecology L.Q. 427-448 (2011).Barrett, Jane F. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett asks. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am by Robert Loeb, Cesar Lopez-Morales
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett also appeared sympathetic to Unikowsky’s argument that the court should not dismiss the case. [read post]